Last month I performed a ‘desktop presentation’ as part of Light Moves Festival of Screendance in Limerick. Over the years I’ve played a lot with ways of presenting ideas to audiences, and this is a first attempt to use the computer desktop as a live site of performance.
The presentation explores the ways in which mobile phones are changing choreographic thinking and practice.
I was trawling through the website of the wonderful Becky Edmunds the other day and stumbled across this utter gem called Have you started dancing yet?
I can’t embed it here but watch it on vimeo.
Its home is here: http://beckyedmunds.com/dancing-yet
MM: Do you think nepotism and privilege might actually be a thing?
JS: Nah, it’s the story they tell children to frighten them at night.
– Heard the other day on the podcast Reconcilable Differences #88 hosted by John Siracusa and Merlin Mann (at 48:00 min)
Link to In Terms of Performance – intermsofperformance.site/keywords – simple yet thoughtful collection of ideas, terms and perspectives about performance and artistic practice.
In May this year, Paul Hughes, Hamish MacPherson and I had a residency at S’ALA in Sassari, Italy. There were no planned outcomes from the work we did together but we ended up writing a document in which we reflect on our experiences.
The document is a PDF and is called We Took Photographs:
Igor and Moreno’s remarkable dance called Idiot-Syncrasy is being presented once again at The Place in London. It’s on Tuesday 9 October 2018, and you live in London (or nearby), and you haven’t seen it before, or want to see it again, now’s your chance.
Igor and Moreno bounce out the pleasures and perils of unison with one another; they tease out where idiosyncrasy and love lie within the rhythms of human life.1
Details at https://www.theplace.org.uk/whats-on/igor-and-moreno-2.
I’ve posted before about The Electronic Frontier Foundation – the non-profit organisation that defends “digital privacy, free speech, and innovation”.
Today they posted some details about the upcoming vote on the EU’s proposed Copyright Directive. The EFF uses some pretty fierce language in relation to articles 11 and 13 of the proposal. They describe it as an “extinction-level event for the Internet as we know it”1.
Under Article 11 — the “link tax” — online services are banned from allowing links to news services on their platforms unless they get a license to make links to the news; the rule does not define “news service” or “link,” leaving 28 member states to make up their own definitions and leaving it to everyone else to comply with 28 different rules.
Under Article 13 — the “censorship machines” — anyone who allows users to communicate in public by posting audio, video, stills, code, or anything that might be copyrighted — must send those posts to a copyright enforcement algorithm. The algorithm will compare it to all the known copyrighted works (anyone can add anything to the algorithm’s database) and censor it if it seems to be a match.
And the (inevitable) Star Wars simile: “using mandatory algorithmic censors and new intellectual property rights to restore balance is like Darth Vader bringing balance to the Force”2
The EU vote is on 12 September 2018 and the EFF take action page is at https://supporters.eff.org/civicrm/mailing/view?reset=1&id=9327